An excellent article by a colleague of mine on the limitations of a solely-exam focused approach to piano teaching. “Imagine the equivalent in literary circles… a child working through the Oxford Reading Tree, then only being allowed to read 24 books in total before A-levels. That’s not 24 novels in English classes, but 24 books in total”
Like many professional instrumental teachers, I have a large proportion of students (a significant majority, to be slightly more specific) who transfer from other local teachers at various stages in their musical education. Many of these (again, a sizeable majority) have one glaring omission in their background; a lack of repertoire.
But why is repertoire so important? And what is being taught instead? And crucially, what does a student miss out on when repertoire is neglected?
But perhaps the first question should be, what is repertoire?
The easiest answer is ‘pieces learned’. Repertoire is the musical equivalent of a bookcase of read novels, a half-completed kindle, a stack of non-fiction magazines and newspaper articles. Repertoire is the Oxford Reading Tree and it is 1984, it is a dictionary and a thesaurus, a children’s encyclopaedia, the collected works of Roald Dahl, and A Brief History of Time. If we learn to…
View original post 432 more words